Installation of the Intensity Pro was simple. Most of the settings you might wish you utilize are available whether you are shooting in NTSC or PAL. Never the less, there are many editors who might not need 24p support, or use Pro Res, and the Intensity Pro might do nicely within the editing bay for those without these needs. In addition, while there are settings for Pro Res 422 HQ, I cannot understand why straight Pro Res 422 is not provided. ![]() The reason for the 59.94 frame rate is due to compatibility for televisions which may or may not support it. However, you are able to play it back over 59.94 if the clip has been captured via firewire (HDV) or AVCHD. This leaves out the many who currently shoot in 24p, and for those shooting in that format, the Intensity Pro would not be for you in terms of capturing. Produced to function only with Intel Macs, the Intensity Pro's HD provides support for 1080i/50, 1080i 59.94, 720p50 and 720p 59.94 and provides Standard Definition support for both NTSC and PAL. While I have only worked with the Intensity Pro, basically the 2 devices are the same with the Intensity Pro adding analog video and audio input and output as well as analog component switches between high definition and standard definition. On the In/Out device end of things Blackmagic Design has produced a very affordable device that, for many, will do the trick.īlackmagic Design has brought out two separate devices, the Intensity, selling as an HDMI only device at $249.00, and the Intensity Pro. The difficulty which presents itself to many editors who do not work in deep pockets production houses, is that in order to avoid the sole use of their canvas for image adjustments, they must consider the costs of a good HDMI monitor as well as an In/Out device that will enable them to view their footage in the same detail and color space as their clients will see upon receiving a finished product.įortunately, even in our current debacle of an economy, the cost of good HDMI monitors has dropped significantly over the last few years. The differences between what one sees in the canvas of their NLE and what is displayed on a good external monitor can be extremely significant. Thus, the videographer must make use of a high-resolution monitor enabling him/her to truly see the details of the clip and the image consistency throughout their sequence. ![]() Windows laptops have some catching up to do.As the technology of video grows and provides an ever more improved image, the need to monitor that image for accurate color correction and composite appearance becomes ever more important. And it should with the 38-core GPU we tested. We saw a pretty big jump in photo editing performance and video transcoding speed, and the M2 Max chip provides a huge GPU boost. It's not a quantum leap ahead of the M1 Pro, but it is notably faster in multiple benchmarks. The MacBook Pro with M2 Pro largely lives up to the hype with Apple's new silicon. The Dell XPS 15 with its Nvidia GeForce 3050 Ti GPU delivered a fairly smooth 38.4 at 1920 x 1080 resolution but only 11 fps at 3,456 x 2,160 pixels. The M2 Max version with 38-core GPU delivered a much higher 73 fps at 1920 x 1200 pixels and a playable 34 fps at the higher 3024 x 1964 resolution. The M2 Pro model mustered only 20.9 fps at that resolution, which is not really playable. The M2 Pro MacBook Pro hit 48.6 fps at 1920 x 1200 resolution, compared to 39.3 fps for the 2021 model with M1 Pro. We ran the Rise of the Tomb Raider benchmark to see how well the MacBook Pro 14-inch 2023 can handle mainstream games, although this is an older title.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |